The chewy thoughts of a queer Christian

The Ex-Gay Debate: Part II – The Unification Church and Homosexuality

The Unification Church is, on all accounts, at least a very interesting religion. It might be small, but in many ways its thinking is unique and it does provide ample opportunities for extended debate on many topics. Unificationist thought is a curious blend of Christianity (mainstream Protestant, Evangelical, and even occasionally Pentecostal) and Korean Confucianism with a broad rudimentary academic edge and Rev. Moon’s personal touch mixed in. While it has a pretty comprehensive response to many problems, homosexuality per sé is not one of them. This is because, on the whole, homosexuality is not considered to ‘exist’ – i.e. gay is not a kind of person in Unificationist thinking. To find out what they really think about homosexuality, you have to do some digging.

Unificationists generally do not think about homosexuality. The basis of their understanding of the universe, as outlined in Rev. Moon’s Exposition of the Divine Principle, is a strict male-female dichotomy. The universe works because masculinity and femininity attract one another. Atoms, plants, animals, people all exist and continue to exist because of male-female relationships and therefore God must also be so. God exists because his masculinity and femininity eternally spin in a never-ending circle, and the universe reflects that. Rev. and Mrs. Moon are the saviours of all humankind because they embody this divine complementarity on Earth.

Because God is one being, He splits His masculinity and femininity into separate entities when He creates and intends them to reunite in order to reflect Him. God would not create gay people and probably, in fact, could not create gay people. All gay people are perverting God’s plan for creation which is made manifest in the natural world – many Unificationists do not know about the existence of intersex people (see also here for BBC analysis of the issue) or the occurrence of same-sex relationships in the animal kingdom, or simply gloss over them. God’s intention is that perfected man and woman form Ideal Families that multiply into extended family, social, national and world level manifestations of God’s Kingdom, eventually establishing the Kingdom of God on Earth and in Heaven.

When your worldview rests on the idea that everything fits this perfect cosmic order, it messes with your mind when you start feeling attracted to people of the same sex. Just sayin’.

Many Unificationists are, however, quite intellectually astute. They are not naïve. They know that many people identify as gay: although of course, no one is really gay. This requires an explanation, and homosexuality is bunched up with the one massive evil which is threatening Western society today: the breakdown of the family. The implication, of course, is that everyone is heterosexual and that homosexuality is a perversion promoted by Satan to distract people from building True Families. More recently Rev. Moon has been preaching “absolute sexual morality” that almost certainly would exclude same-sex intercourse because even straight people shouldn’t be doing it that way. It’s just not allowed. Homosexuality is depraved and clearly belongs to the ‘fallen realm’. The sad reality is that, due in part to the highly conservative nature of the Unification Church (e.g. no smoking, drinking, sex before marriage; promotion of early waking hours and regular fasting), some members consider that homosexuality simply cannot exist in Church members. The marriage blessing of Rev. and Mrs. Moon is believed to remove Original Sin from its partakers, allowing them to give birth to children ‘as pure and clear as crystal’. Exactly what this means, however, is uncertain. The idea that the children of those married in the ceremony (the second generation, my generation) could be gay is in itself a little bit controversial.

So when your life plan is built around getting married by Rev. Moon and building an Ideal Family, it kind of screws up your plan when you start feeling attracted to people of the same sex. The initial response is, maybe it will go away. Eventually, almost ten years in my case, you realise that is not going to happen.

That is when I started digging, and actively looking for what the Church had to say about homosexuality. To start with, Rev. Moon’s most controversial statement is from a speech in 1997 (scroll to the middle), in which he repeatedly calls homosexuals “dung eating dogs”. But there are other examples which do border slightly on the delusional such as this:

“If you practised homosexuality before joining the Unification Church and you have still not ended such relationships, you will go straight to hell. Once you are deeply moved by the truth, everything of that old lifestyle should flee away. You have been born again. Now, no matter how much you formerly enjoyed it, your heart says no. Therefore, you have nothing to do with it. If you cannot subjugate those feelings, you should repent and pray and wail with tears.” 219:233, September 8, 1991 (World Scripture II, p. 647)


“What did God expect from Adam and Eve? He expected absolute purity and love. Where there is absolute sex [sometimes translated ‘absolute sexual morality’], couples of absolute purity will emerge, and concepts such as free sex, homosexuality and lesbianism will automatically disappear.

–  Cheon Seong Gyeong, Book 4, Ch 12, Sec 7 (Cheon Seong Gyeong is a comprehensive collection of quotes from Rev. Moon’s speeches.)

The basic attitude encouraged, then, is that homosexuality should disappear. Homosexuality should go away. Homosexuals, as people, obviously do not care enough about being straight otherwise they would just give up the whole charade and just get married like everyone else. They should submit themselves to God’s ideal because,

“Through the power of the Spirit, they can control their former feelings and re-train themselves to love their heterosexual spouse.” – World Scripture II, p 1129

Despite all this, I am struck by the sadly missed potential for Unificationism to celebrate homosexuality. The Church itself is a veritable celebration of sexuality. The Church worships a married couple and considers the sexual organs to be the finest part of God’s creation. Marriage and marriage rededication are a massive part of the Church’s culture. The acknowledgement of the innateness of sexuality in human nature and God’s delight at married couples’ lovemaking is extraordinary. But not for gays. Nope. Man and woman only. If your feelings are for someone of the opposite sex, they are holy, they are good and there is even some possibility that they may be divine (Exposition of the Divine Principle. Ch1 Sec2). If your feelings are for someone of the same sex, however, then they are perverted, evil and possibly Satanic. Having experienced both, I have to say that it is utterly impossible to distinguish one as being very different from the other: love is love. If the one is worth celebrating, the other is also; or else the feelings themselves are not holy and should not be labelled as such.

The Unification Church is convinced of its destiny to break through into mainstream society and become a major world religion. If this does happen, I think that as its public presence rises, it is likely to get more and more shtick for its anti-gay stance. Perhaps it is uniquely placed to give a solid critique of homosexuality, but it falls far short of offering anything at all helpful for real life homosexual people. The words of its founder, recorded forever, will make this difficult to hide. Unificationism takes a lot of cues from evangelical Christianity and it would not surprise me if at some point it adopted ex-gay ministry, just with slightly different language. (In fact, Richard Cohen of the International Healing Foundation  is a former member of the Unification Church and probably was developing the Church’s response before he left and took his work with him. He is an ‘ex-gay’, married with children and says, “I am living my dream”,  a little bit too often.) If the Church does not collapse under its own weight, it will have to start answering for the large gap in its teachings. The only problem is that most members are entirely unaware of it, and believe its doctrine to be watertight and salvific. Let’s see what happens.

Feel free to comment with thoughts or questions. Especially if you are a Unificationist, do let me know what you think.

This article is the second in a three-part series. Find Part I here and Part III here.


Single Post Navigation

One thought on “The Ex-Gay Debate: Part II – The Unification Church and Homosexuality

  1. The truth; as they say; is stranger than fiction…..

    Here are some more Ruminations……

    In the Judgment they are represented in four rather broad categories:

    A. Virgin to men; but not to women; married and even with families: but secretly desiring men. For men where thus is unconscious they are “latent” homosexuals; where it is conscious but unfulfilled they are “extant” homosexuals. These men are Supressed in either case; the latter being deferential as aware of their desire; the former sufferantial as unaware of it.
    With some of these “self-suppressed” men they end up leaving these families and become strictly engaged with men; usually after their children are older and on their own.
    B. Not virgin to men nor virgin to women; but married to women with children; but secretly having relationships outside their marriage with men. These men are self-Repressed; and usually find in their marriages they are Oppressed.
    C. Not virgin to men; but virgin to women; having relationships only with men; and never married. These men are pretty rare however; as most gay men have had some female contact of some kind, which they often blame on unfortunate occasions that happened to them against their wills; as being taken advantage of under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol.
    D. Virgin to men and virgin to women; but secretly desiring men.
    This curious category of men who have had no sexual contact with either sex but who do have a hidden preference had they the opportunity to have the one of their desire also happens to include one apostle whom my Father Lord Jesus called “a devil”; the one who appeared to everyone as an “angel of light”; even rebuking Jesus in his father’s house ( Simon the Leper was the father of Judas ) and striking the Shepherd with the Sword of God; of which the Sufis themselves define by saying “the Sword of God is ‘the hungry stomach’s of the Poor’.” ( This definition is seen “Caravan of Dreams: by Idries Shah on page 131 ).
    Judas angrily criticized Jesus and even condemned him in self-righteous anger for wasting 300 pence of ointment on himself; this expensive ointment called spikenard that Mary of Bethany poured over him at the house of Judas Iscariot’s father: Simon the Leper.
    But in reality Judas was insanely jealous of Mary because he was in love with Jesus himself; and not in a good way; but as a Sodomite; which means he didn’t imagine himself satisfying Jesus in the form of a woman: but in the form of a man; and this man happened to be Judas himself in the flesh: the son of Perdition; the discarnate image of God; which happened to be the Son of Man himself; who symbolized Seth; as always.
    Few know that Judas’ father Simon and Judas himself were both from Bethany also; Judas knew Lazurus and his two sister’s quite well; Martha and Mary of Bethany. The two women are also the prototypes of the Kingdom as the 10 virgins that both secretly represent the Divided Kingdom who Lord Jesus called later on two distinct hands; the 5 wise virgins, as of Mary of Bethany who listened at his feet and gathered the “oil of gladness”; and the 5 foolish virgins, as of Martha who made a show of being responsible but who ignored Lord Jesus and his message entirely; and gathered no “oil”; except the “oil of sadness” when Mary went in and she was left outside. So one is a “false” left hand; and one is a “true” left hand. For just as soul and spirit are the two hands of God the male and female repreent the two feet of God.
    Judas then also appears as “an angel” or “minister of righteousness”; the devil whom Jesus called one of his closest companions and who had the position of the treasurer; although John calls Judas a thief. This same Judas Iscariot; who secretly desired Jesus himself.
    Thus we have a strange question answered: when Jesus says to Judas these words; to wit;
    “Betrayest thou the Son of Man with a Kiss?”
    The Men of Sodom in the days of Lot

    Homosexuality has then been with us since long before the days of my Father Lord Jesus; whose foresight of what was to come upon the Men of Sodom still looms large for those who wonder what these men who operate in a spiritual reality in a spiritual city that is Sodom: as of an invisible geography of their sexual location in relation to other men; but as with all things where the Lamb is concerned the appearence is misleading; if one wants the truth one has to see what is uncovered at the End.
    The Fall was of an angel; then a woman; and then a man; at the second and more universal fall we have the third of the Host of the Angel then with the Daughters of men; and then afterwards the men of Sodom who tried to violate the angels Michael and Gabriel who came to the house of Lot to see him.
    As my Father Lord Jesus did say of his second coming in the guise once again of the unseen Son of Man who Ezekiel and Daniel were also called themselves by that curious term so that “as it ways in the days of Lot; so shall it be in the days of the coming of the Son of man”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

How To Be A Hipster Without Really Trying

Just another site

Mr Ken Brown


Gay Everyday

Helping and Encouraging Gay (Christian) Men

This Is a Blog

Ruining My Professional Reputation One Blog Post at a Time.


the (occasionally) banal musings of t-dub

Spiritual Friendship

Musings on God, friendship, relationships

I like argyle.

political rants from an extremely liberal nerd with ridiculously good fashion sense

a better story

learning to choose quality over quantity one day at a time


Centering Fatherhood for Gay Men


A place for LGBTQ Salvationists and Allies

Confessions of a Skeptical Evangelical

The Questions and Thoughts of a Nobody...

Tyler: A Blog

Ponderings of a (former?) Christian gay sex addict...

Worst. Christian. Ever.

Musings on the modern American Christian landscape. Blah.


Bryan Currie: a place for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Christians to think about how gay and God can fit together

Coming Out Christian

One liberation under God...

Gay Chronicles

Chronicling the life of an ordinary gay

The Blog

The latest news on and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: